Sakana said its AI generated the first peer-reviewed scientific publication. But while the claim isn't untrue, there are ...

According to the release, the NIH's proposal to centralize peer review is "under review with implementation pending external ...

Agency says move will save money and reduce bias, but researchers are concerned about associated staff reductions ...

Although university researchers don’t believe the change itself poses a clear risk to the scientific review process, ongoing ...

In a stark sign of scientists’ escalating frustration with how academic journals operate, researchers are taking on six ...

Peer accountability can boost student engagement in online schooling. Strategies such as group discussions, peer reviews, ...

Peer review ensures the findings of research are trustworthy. But what happens when it’s performed by an AI model?

Institutional peer review led to recommended changes in more than one-quarter of radiotherapy treatment plans, according to results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.Recommendations for changes ...

Queen’s researchers are investigating how scientific journals could improve their process for reviewing and publishing new papers. Can paying referees help?

The increasing involvement of AI in the peer review process raises concerns about its impact on academic publishing. An ...

Today the National Institutes of Health is announcing plans to centralize peer review of all applications for grants, cooperative agreements and research and development contracts within the agency's ...