The peer-review process for psychological research is strained to the breaking point, jeopardizing the efficacy of the ...

What is peer review of teaching (PRT)? Peer review is recognized in academia as a measure for ensuring quality work that meets standards and expectations among experts. Similarly, peer review of ...

What's wrong with peer review? Peter Lawrence, a developmental biologist who is also an editor at the journal Development and former editorial board member at Cell, has been publishing papers in ...

Peer review can be stressful, even for the most seasoned scholarly writers. Will the reviewers “get” your book project or pan it? There is always a degree of uncertainty. But a negative review ...

The Center regularly shares its research by publishing articles in peer-reviewed scholarly journals such as the American Journal of Public Health and Pediatrics, the official journal of the American ...

One of the core features of the scientific community is the concept of “peer review” where any claims made by a scientist are open to be analyzed and reproduced by others in the community for ...

One of these processes is peer review, which is one of the predominant methods to ensure that only sound science is released to the public via scientific journals. Peer reviewers are professional ...

The following types of contribution to Nature Portfolio journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Letters, Brief Communications, Matters Arising, Technical Reports, Analysis, Resources, Reviews ...

This guide is designed to provide faculty and departments with insights on performing effective peer review of teaching. It was developed in October 2017 by members of a Faculty Learning Community: ...